Arizona State (2-0) hosts Hofstra (1-1) at Desert Financial Arena on Tuesday, November 10, at 9 p.m. ET on ESPN+. It is the first meeting between the programs. It is also the third game of a five-game homestand that opens the season, and Randy Bennett is trying to start his ASU tenure 3-0. This is a college basketball game, so there are no pitchers or park factors. The analysis rests on early-season scoring, rebounding and style.
Our pick is Under 134.5.
The number
Our model engine returned no data for this game. That means we have no model probability (n/a), no market-implied probability to compare (n/a), no computed edge (None) and no model confidence rating (None).
We are publishing the pick to our public ledger anyway, and it will be graded like every other entry. Readers should weigh it accordingly. This is a lean built from the researched context below, not a quantified edge. We will not attach a number we did not calculate, and we will not estimate a projected final score.
Why the model leans this way
The case for the Under rests on a few verifiable inputs. None of them is decisive alone.
1. Hofstra's last game was a low-scoring one. The Pride lost to Princeton 60-58 on Thursday. That is 118 combined points, 16.5 below this line. Tanner Thomas led Hofstra with 14 points and nine rebounds. A team that just played in a game in the 110s needs a large shift in pace or shooting to help push a total past 134.5.
2. Hofstra's three-point profile is a known quantity, and size can contest it. Last season Hofstra made 9.5 threes per game (52nd nationally) on 37.0% from deep (30th). That is a real strength. But ASU is officially the tallest roster in Sun Devil program history. Length on the perimeter is one of the few structural ways to lower a good shooting team's volume or accuracy. If Hofstra's threes fall closer to average, its scoring path narrows considerably.
3. The rebounding matchup favors fewer cheap points. In the win over Northern Colorado, ASU outrebounded its opponent 40-32. Hofstra was the 39th-ranked offensive rebounding team last season. A taller ASU front line that limits Hofstra's second chances removes a key source of easy baskets.
4. First meetings and early-season uncertainty. These programs have no history together. Both teams are still settling rotations in November; ASU's Bryce Ford, a Scottsdale native, made an impact off the bench Friday. Unfamiliarity and unsettled rotations can produce choppier offense than either team's best night.
The case against
This section deserves real weight. The strongest evidence on the board points the other way.
ASU's own games have gone over this number. The Sun Devils beat Northern Colorado 90-63, a 153-point game. They beat East Tennessee State 75-65, a 140-point game. Both cleared 134.5. ASU alone produced 90 points against UNCO. Paulius Murauskas scored a career-high 33 in that game, with only six of those points from three. That is an interior scorer Hofstra will have to account for. If ASU reaches 75 or more again, Hofstra needs only about 60 to push this over.
Hofstra's shooting can overwhelm a total quickly. A team that made 9.5 threes per game last season can run hot on any given night. A strong shooting night from Hofstra, combined with ASU's demonstrated scoring at home, is a straightforward path to the Over.
The rebounding edge comes with caveats. ASU finished 265th in offensive rebounding last season, but that was a different roster under a different staff. Last season's numbers may tell us little about this group. Hofstra's offensive rebounding is a genuine strength, and extra possessions raise totals.
Small samples. We have two ASU games and one Hofstra score to work from. We could not confirm any injury or starting-lineup news for either team. Late information could move this in either direction.
How often does this lose? Without model output, we cannot give a calibrated probability, and we will not invent one. Our plain assessment is that this is a contested lean, not a strong position. ASU's two results argue directly against it, and a reasonable reader could treat this game as close to a coin flip. Ordinary variance alone (free throws in the final minutes, a cluster of made threes) can decide a total sitting this close to recent outcomes.
Bottom line: Under 134.5, logged to the ledger at a stated low-information status. The argument rests on Hofstra's 118-point outing, ASU's size against a perimeter-reliant opponent, and early-season roughness. The risk is ASU's 153- and 140-point results.
---
21+. Predictions carry real risk of loss; set limits, and if it stops being fun, free confidential help is available at 1-800-522-4700.